Tuesday, September 28, 2004
Kingston's 4 GB CompactFlash Card: Fast and Big
Posted by Jason Dunn in "HARDWARE" @ 07:00 AM
To answer the first question, "Does it work", the answer is yes: I put the 4 GB card into my Canon 300D and my Canon S400, and it was recognized by both cameras. The image below was when the camera was inserted into my S400, a 4 megapixel camera set at maximum resolution and maximum image quality. That's right, 2036 photos. 8O
I was able to use the card normally for loading up music as well - I added every music file in my New Songs folder (where I keep music I've bought in the last 6-10 months), which was 834 files in total. That might not sound like much, but that's 43 full albums and about 50 singles. I tend to rip at high bit rates (192 kbps WMA or 224 kbps MP3), so if you're ripping at 64 kbps you can fit approximately 139 albums according to Windows Media Player's estimate that an average album will take up 28 MB of space.
Speeds tests revealed that this card is a burner: 6552 KB/s for 1 MB reads, and 6040 KB/s for 1 MB writes. My ancient Canon 32 MB card scored 3136 KB/s for 1 MB reads and only 614 KB/s for 1 MB reads. In comparison, my 512 MB Sandisk Ultra II scored 7474 KB/s for 1 MB reads and 5220 KB/s for 1 MB reads. So while the Kingston 4GB lagged by 900 KB/s or so while reading 1 MB files, it was a full 820 KB/s faster at writing files, which is what counts in almost every scenario. Why? Rare is the data file that will require 6.5 MB/s of raw bandwidth, so as long as you're above 2000 KB/s or so, you'll rarely see any sort of hiccup related to data read speeds.
With a price tag of $500 USD, this is not a memory card for a casual user, but that's to be expected at the high end. With a lifetime warranty, fast read/write speeds, and the respected Kingston brand-name, this is a serious card for serious users. It boasts the size of all but the biggest microdrives on the market, and the power-friendly nature of CompactFlash.