Monday, May 9, 2005
PC World Looks at the new AMD Dual-Core CPUs
Posted by Jason Dunn in "ARTICLE" @ 05:00 PM
"AMD fans need wait no longer for dual-core desktop processors--they're ready now. And in our exclusive tests of an AMD reference system, we found that it beat Intel's dual-core Pentium Extreme Edition across the board. As with dual-core Pentium EE systems, you'll get the most performance benefit when you're working with multiple applications at once, or when you use multithreaded software, which can recognize more than one processor. Dual-core chips build in two processing cores, in effect giving you two CPUs in one piece of silicon. You also get two L2 memory caches, one for each core--the 2.4-GHz Athlon 64 X2 4800+ chip we tested, for example, had 1MB of L2 per core (CPUs also have 64KB of L1 cache per core). The Athlon 64 X2 processors (formerly code-named Toledo) all have 64-bit support and will ship in June, joining AMD's already-available dual-core Opteron server and workstation processors. Additional X2 models range from the 2.4-GHz 4600+ with 512KB of L2 cache per core to the 2.2-GHz 4200+ with 512KB of L2 cache per core."
If there's one constant in the digital media editing world, it's that there's no such thing as too much rendering power. Just when you think you have a fast system, invariably you'll end up tackling a video project that's bigger than you've ever worked on before, and you find yourself in dire need of more CPU firepower. In the next couple of years, may of us will find ourselves working on HD projects, which ups the ante even more. AMD looks like they're kicking ass and taking names in the dual core fight, and they have the added bonus of (by all accounts) working in current sockets with current chipsets, requiring only a BIOS update. Intel's dual-core CPUs will require a whole new chipset; even the swanky new 925XE chipset (which powers the Shuttle SB95P2 that I'm using to post this). :?
If there's one constant in the digital media editing world, it's that there's no such thing as too much rendering power. Just when you think you have a fast system, invariably you'll end up tackling a video project that's bigger than you've ever worked on before, and you find yourself in dire need of more CPU firepower. In the next couple of years, may of us will find ourselves working on HD projects, which ups the ante even more. AMD looks like they're kicking ass and taking names in the dual core fight, and they have the added bonus of (by all accounts) working in current sockets with current chipsets, requiring only a BIOS update. Intel's dual-core CPUs will require a whole new chipset; even the swanky new 925XE chipset (which powers the Shuttle SB95P2 that I'm using to post this). :?
